Õ¬ÄÐÊÓƵ

XClose

Reading Recovery Europe

Home
Menu

Cost-effectiveness

Given the competing demands on education budgets, literacy interventions need to be cost-effective.

Given the competing demands on education budgets, literacy interventions need to be cost-effective.ÌýNo analysis has compared the different types of implementation for interventions (for example, small-group instruction with one-to-one instruction).ÌýIn Reading Recovery, the long-term benefits of literacy achievement may significantly outweigh the short-term cost of instruction and teacher preparation. By intervening early, Reading Recovery reduces later costs in special education, later catch-up programmes, and has lasting effects. The local cost of providing Reading Recovery services for 12 to 20 weeks will be substantially less than the future costs of meeting the needs of large number of pupils who cannot access the curriculum.

Pro Bono Economics (2018), ÌýÌý‘Assessing the impact of the Reading Recovery programme. An economic evaluation’.

Area Education Agency 267 (2017), Reading Recovery Cost Effectiveness.

KPMG Foundation (2013),Ìý

Schwartz, R.M. Schmitt, M.C. and Lose, M.K. (2012),ÌýÌýThe Elementary School Journal, 112 (4), 547-567.

Department for Education (2011),Ìý, DFE-RR114.

Hummel-Rossi, B & Ashdown, J (2010)ÌýÌýReading Recovery Council of North America: Columbus, OH, USA.

Ìý(PDF), 2nd edition. (2009, January). Every Child A Chance Trust.

Gómez-Bellengé, F.X. (2007)Ìý'.ÌýThe Journal of Reading Recovery, 6 (2), 53-56.

Ashdowne, J. and Hummel-Rossi, B. (2002) ''ÌýThe Journal of Reading Recovery, 2 (1), 44-46.

Gómez-Bellengé, F.X. (2002) ''.ÌýThe Journal of Reading Recovery, 2 (1), 47-54.

Pinnell. G.S. (1997) 'Reading Recovery: A summary of research'. In Flood, J., Heath, S.B. and Lapp, D. (Eds.),ÌýÌý(sponsored by the International Reading Association). USA: New York.