լƵ

XClose

Teaching & Learning

Home
Menu

Online alternatives for final year research projects

Dr Nephtali Marina-Gonzalez, UCL Division of Medicine and secondee at the Arena Centre, explains a novel approach to deliver undergraduate final year research projects.

surface-xhsyzoic_sm-unsplash_1_web_ready_800x500.jpg

2 June 2020

The final year research project is the pinnacle of biomedical sciences degrees and provides essential training to students wishing to pursue a scientific career.

Introducing non-lab based research projects

Dr Nephtali Marina-Gonzalez shares his experience of offering non-lab based, “alternative” research projects in the Applied Medical Sciences programme.

He includes tips for staff who want to implement this initiative to deliver final year or capstone projects remotely or online.

Embedding student voice through surveys

Less than 10% of biomedical sciences students pursue careers in research. The need to broaden the type of final year research projects being completed is becoming increasingly important.

We know fromstudent surveysthat modules, where laboratory-based projects were replacedwith solely (critical) reviews of the literature, would not be selected by students. Therefore, rather than offering this kind of module, we insteadintegrated opportunities for students to complete "alternative" research-based projects into modules that traditionally offered lab-based projects only.

Pilot of non-lab based research projects

At the beginning of 2019/20, pre-Covid-19, I gathered a team of supportive colleagues within our Division to pilot a small number of alternative projects designed to help students develop a wider range of relevant employability skills.I was inspired by a similar initiative thathad been developed by Dr Dave Lewis at Leeds University.

Four students were selected to undertake research projects on topics which aligned to their career goals, such as:

  • public engagement
  • educational development
  • machine learning

I supervised one of these students in collaboration with Prof David Spratt (Division of Medicine).

Their research project wasdedicated to writing an ethics approval application and creating a strategic plan to establish long-term collaborations with primary schools in London that would allow future students to carry out educational research projects.

All fourstudents enrolled in the pilot were very engaged with their projects and the supervisors were pleased with the results obtained.

Did you know you can continue to build Community-engaged learning into your virtual teaching? Attend events throughoutJune toAugust 2020.

Advaith Veturi, a final year student who undertook a project on machine learning, said:

The research project went great! I really had fun and gained a lot of skills in writing programmes for medical data… my supervisor said that the team will likelyhire a research fellow to take over, to do more analysis and include my results in a publication, so I could see my name in a paper in the next few months!

Responding to COVID-19

The need to overhaul lab-based projects became more urgentduring the Covid-19 crisis. With physical distancing in operation, access to laboratory facilities and research funding for the new academic year might be uncertain.

The four students on the pilot continued working remotely under continuous supervision and managed to submit their dissertations on time.

Whatoriginally was created as alternatives to tackle the lack of lab-based research projects, became an important approach to facilitate the delivery of research projects across a whole cohort.

Scoping online final research projects

With the pivot to online study, thisapproach may become more popular across many disciplines.

Dr Lewis has recently expanded the variety of alternative research projects that can be delivered online:

  • Virtual fieldwork: using publicly available webcams or video recordings of humans, animals or the environment to explore discipline-relevant research questions.
  • Bioinformatics/Big data: using bioinformatics tools to mine/interrogate (e.g. genomic) datasets. Analysis and interpretation of large publically available (e.g. health, environment) or school/faculty research (e.g. neuronal recordings) datasets.
  • Computational modelling/Simulations: investigate physiological, pharmacological or biochemical modulation of existing models or simulations of systems, organs or tissues (e.g. intact animals, heart, neurones).

    This could include the evaluation of the scientific accuracy, validity and educational benefits of simulations/models used for educational purposes or accuracy of automated data tracking/scoring systems (e.g. OptiMouse).
  • Systematic Reviews with/without meta-analysis: a defined, systematic way of undertaking a comprehensive review of the literature, used a lot in clinical trials/health science, but increasingly in animal experiments and education.

    Previous reviews include: pharmacotherapies for gestational diabetes; Animal welfare factors influencing reproducibility and reliability of studies involving lab animals; E-learning and other resources as replacements for face toface undergraduate practical’s in the Biosciences.
  • Surveys/Focus Groups: Any topic/area, of students, staff or the public.

    Previous topics included: public attitudes/knowledge of antimicrobial resistance; attitudes to the use of animals in education; the interaction between developers, clinicians and patients in the developmentof Digital Health Apps.
  • Scientific writing:the creation of .Content behind each tab was written by a team of students.
  • Educational Development: creation and evaluation of educational resources for use in undergraduate education. Ideal opportunity for a student to re-purpose existing face toface practical into an online version or create online problem solving or data handling/analysis exercise.
  • Science in Schools/Public Engagement: creation ofan interactive science workshop for use in schools (primary andhigh schools) or a public engagement activity (for the Faculty, Charity or other educational organisation), for virtual or face to face delivery to engage the public with science. If social distancing conditions are relaxed later in the year, deliver this activityin person, if designed as aface toface workshop.
  • Professional Education: development of education and training resources for researchers e.g. The Reproducibility Crisis; podcasts on good practice in specific research methodologies/tools
  • Commercial/Technical reports: using publically available information to write technical or commercial reports (e.g. impact of legislation, analysis of markets etc.) for SME’s, spin-out companies or other clients.
  • Grant proposal: rather than grant proposal as an extension exercise, it becomes the principal output. Sections within it are those in real grant applications to funding bodies e.g. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)or Medical Research Council (MRC.) “Pilot” data comes from previous studies in the supervisor’s lab.

More inclusive projects

In addition, online or predominantly online research projects are more inclusive for students with caring or other responsibilities that prevent them from participating in laboratory-based activities that can take a long time to complete.

Team-based projects

All of the above formats can be delivered as team-based rather than individual projects, thereby providing more real-world experience and the development of additional employability skills.

Consider accreditation requirements

It is important to consult with approval documents before making changes to assessments. It depends on how broadly written the original paperwork and advertised offerings were written.

In our case, the original approval wasvery broad and it allowed us to do the changes without the need of applying for an amendment.

The biggest issue might be accreditation for those degrees that require it. However, in recent years, many UK Bioscience Schools and Faculties are broadening their portfolio offinal year projects formats offered, so these are in line with the substantially revised requirements of the, whichaccredits the Applied Medical Sciences programme.

Top tips for getting started with Alternative Research projects

  1. Check the UPCs for your module. They should be broad and generic to allow you to implement the changes without applying for amendments.
  2. Encourage supportive colleagues in your Faculty to offer a wide range of projects that are suitable to their area of expertise.
  3. Start with research projects that do not require ethics approval. You can eventually consider applying for blanket ethics approval that covers all the projects across your faculty.
  4. Encourage students to write learning contracts that state what and how they will approach their learning, so staff can refine their focus if they are unused to these formats
  5. Encourage supervisors to attend training sessions offered by the Arena Centre.
  6. Selecting suitable students for each type of project is essential. Ensure you identify students whose career goals are aligned with the research project.

Dr Nephtali Marina-Gonzalez would like to thank supportive colleagues from UCL and around the UK for their support. including:

  • Dr Dave Lewis for his mentorship and support and for providing the resourcesneeded to implement this new initiative.
  • Dr Jennifer Rohn, UCL Division of Medicine, for providing several research projects during the initial pilot test.
  • The Applied Medical Sciences course director, Prof. David Spratt, who showed great leadership and support by providing educational research projects in primary schools, creating links with external partners and encouraging staff to adopt this initiative.